Fact
and Myths
Myth: The Purple Line will destroy the Capital Crescent
Trail.
Fact: The Capital Crescent Trail is the heavily used
paved trail now running from Bethesda to Georgetown; it
will not be touched by the Purple Line in any way. The
Purple Line will be built on the other side of downtown
Bethesda along a former railroad right-of-way bought by
the county 15 years ago. When the light rail line is
built, the paved trail will extend east from Wisconsin
Ave. as far as Silver Spring, running alongside the new
tracks. The old railroad right-of-way is 60 - 100 ft.
wide in Chevy Chase, leaving room for two tracks, a
trail, and a vegetated buffer. The extension of the
paved trail will replace a shorter interim gravel trail,
called the Georgetown Branch Trail, which goes part way
to Silver Spring. Trail are used for commuters on bikes,
blades and foot. The trail that is a part of the Inner
Purple Line extends 4.4 miles in a direct route between
Silver Spring and Bethesda.
Myth: The Outer Purple Line is better with higher
ridership.
Fact: Computer calculations of ridership are higher
on the Outer than Inner Purple Line. However, that
ridership is inflated due to several large parking lots
on the Outer line. The adjacent neighborhoods will not
allow those lots to be built. Also, computer
calculations omitted students commuting on the Inner
line to the University of Maryland at College Park. When
the corrections are made, the ridership differences will
be insignificant. Given the vast cost difference, the
Inner line is far more cost-effective per rider.
Myth: The Bethesda/Silver Spring portion of the Purple
Line can be put underground.
Fact: If it is put underground for the better-off
Chevy Chase folks, environmental justice will require
that it be put underground for the whole alignment. This
will raise the cost for the Inner Purple Line to nearly
$3 billion dollars. (14 miles times $200 million/mile).
The price tag is too high to allow it to be built. There
are just too many cities around the country competing to
build light rail not involving costly underground
construction.
Myth: Light rail substantially slower than heavy rail.
Fact: Light rail and heavy rail use similar traction
motor technology. The speed of any light rail line
primarily depends on the number of stops, street
crossings at grade, and the degree to which it is
street-running, (i.e., mixed with automobile traffic).
The Silver Spring-Bethesda section of the Inner Purple
Line does not mix with automobile traffic and has only
one significant street crossing. Light rail travel time
between Silver Spring and Bethesda is 10 minutes; By no
means is this slow.
Myth: The at-grade crossing at Connecticut Avenue will
tie up traffic.
Fact: How the light rail line crosses Connecticut
Avenue will be determined by the engineering work. There
is no reason it can not go over (above grade) or under
(below grade) Connecticut Avenue. Because the Georgetown
Branch is becoming the Inner Purple Line, the odds are
high that it does not cross Connecticut Avenue at-grade.
Myth: The Purple Line will not be connected to either
the Bethesda or Silver Spring Metro stations.
Fact: At Bethesda, the rail line will end under
Wisconsin Avenue, and a new elevator shaft will be dug
to connect it with the southern end of the Bethesda
Metro station. This station was built with a "knock
out panel" to allow easy access. This elevator will
also serve as a new southern entrance to the Bethesda
Metro station for Bethesda residents and workers.
In Silver Spring, the light rail will follow the
existing CSX railroad right-of-way to the new Silver
Spring Transit Center, which will include the Silver
Spring Metro Station. The Silver Spring light rail stop
will actually be between the Metro station and the new
transit center within the railroad right-of-way.
Myth: Light rail would introduce new technology to
Metro and require new investment in equipment,
maintenance, and staff.
Fact: There are several existing transit agencies
that have both heavy and light rail as part of their
system network. Philadelphia and Boston are two that
come to mind. They have both heavy and light rail.
Closer by is Baltimore; Baltimore's experience is
typical of transit and rail system operations. The local
political leadership in the Baltimore region has not
made the necessary commitment to transit oriented
development that Montgomery County has. Furthermore,
Baltimore has never made the commitment to or put out
the incentives to build ridership that have been made or
done in the Washington, DC area.
Myth: Light rail will not generate the 50% fare box
recovery required by state law.
Fact: Several years ago, the General Assembly changed
the cost recovery requirements to 40% for transit
projects and it gave new rail projects a one year
exemption to allow them a period of time to build
ridership. Also the cost recovery requirement applies to
the entire system, not to individual lines and routes.
Why must transit projects be required to meet
specific cost recovery requirements? There is no
"cost recovery requirement" for roads. The gas
tax and other automobile fees go to pay for State roads.
While the State does give the County and municipalities
a small portion of the State gas tax revenue, this
portion does not come close to covering the total costs
of County or municipal roads. The cost of these roads
comes from the property tax and piggy-back to the State
income tax collected by Counties and municipalities.
Myth: An Outer Purple Line integrated into the existing
Metrorail system would be better utilized.
Fact: What Montgomery County needs is a transit
ladder for east-west transportation, and the first rung
should be the Purple Line between Bethesda and Silver
Spring. The County owns the right-of-way, and this rung
can be built and operating on it by 2008. An Outer
Purple Line, if started when the next Governor takes
office, could not be built and operating until some time
after 2020 because it is longer to build. That wait is
too long to provide a viable transportation alternative
to the County’s two largest employment centers:
Bethesda and Silver Spring.
Myth: Monorail could be built instead of light rail to
avoid impacts on the community.
Fact: Monorail is much more intrusive than
at-grade light rail - it looks very much like an
overhead rail line, as shown in this
picture and this
one from Las Vegas. The Las Vegas monorail
vehicles are also much slower and carry fewer
passengers than the light rail Purple Line would
carry. Furthermore, monorail is a proprietary
technology, with each manufacturer making its own
different type of system - meaning that when you
need spare parts, or new vehicles, or want to expand the
system, you can't get competitive bids and have to
pay what the manufacturer wants.
Inner Purple Line in the News

(Click on the title in blue to link
to the articles below.)
Duncan,
O’Malley agree on Purple Line, but make no promises
(June 16, 2006)
Although Baltimore Mayor Martin O’Malley and Montgomery
County Executive Douglas M. Duncan said they support a
long-debated Purple Line project linking Montgomery and
Prince George’s counties, advocates wanted to hear a
solid commitment to building the 14-mile light-rail line
at the Greater Washington Board of Trade forum in
Bethesda.
Bethesda
Metro station entrance proposal has twice the importance
(May 9, 2006)
Montgomery County Council President George Leventhal makes
no secret of why he wants Maryland to spend $50 million to
build a series of high-speed elevators at the south end of
the Bethesda Metro station...help boost Metro ridership
...would also be a minor victory in a decades-long battle
to build the $2 billion Purple Line
Another
Rail Line Route Added (May 4, 2005)
Transportation planners have added a third potential
alignment for the Inner Purple Line route in east Silver
Spring and Takoma Park.
Students
Could Benefit from a Little Purple (April 29,
2005)
A new Metro line to suburban Maryland could benefit the
many GW students that live or work in Maryland but do not
have cars. Currently, the Metro extends into all of these
cities but do not connect to each other, or places in
between.
Purple
Line Likely to be Key Issue in Governor's Race (March
6, 2005)
In the ongoing debate over whether highways or railways
will best solve Washington's crushing traffic problems,
the Purple Line once seemed like the clear winner...But
three years later, with a new governor in office, the
proposal languishes in the planning stages.
Fortunes
Shift for East-West Rail Line (Jan 16, 2005)
It was only three years ago -- the blink of an eye in
transportation planning -- that a proposed light-rail link
between Bethesda and New Carrollton via Silver Spring
seemed on a fast track to construction....The 14-mile
Purple Line is on what Montgomery County Council President
Tom Perez (D-Silver Spring) calls "life
support."
Silver
Spring Transit LInk Up for Vote (Sept 30, 2004)
Montgomery County planning officials are expected to vote
today on whether to study two routes for a light-rail line
between Silver Spring and Langley Park
Sierra
Club: Purple Line imperiled (Jun 21, 2004)
The Sierra Club is criticizing the Bush administration for
what it says is a lack of money that puts new rail
projects, including the Purple Line from Bethesda to New
Carrollton, at risk.
Response
from Federal Transit Administration (Aug 3,
2004)
Council,
university back transit plans for College Park area
(Apr 14, 2004)
The College Park City Council applauded the efforts
Tuesday of state transit administration officials who are
working on plans for a bi-county public transportation
system.
Senate
expected to pass transportation bill (Apr 9,
2004)
Montgomery lawmakers extract project promises.
No
transitway for Takoma Park streets (March 3,
2004)
State transportation planners have abandoned a proposal to
build an east-west rapid transit line through the center
of Takoma Park, and will focus instead on other routes to
bring the Bi-County Transitway through, around or under
the city, a state official said Tuesday.
Chamber
of Commerce sets transportation priorities (Dec
3, 2003)
A light rail trolley from Silver Spring to Bethesda, an
east-west highway linking I-270 and I-95, and an enlarged
Montrose Parkway would ease traffic congestion, improving
conditions for Bethesda and Chevy Chase businesses,
according to the local chamber of commerce.
Officials
blast transitway, call for Purple Line revival
(Sep 24, 2003)
State, county and local officials in eastern Montgomery
County voiced their opposition last week to the Bi-County
Transitway, calling instead for state transportation
planners to revive the Purple Line.
Hurson
rides bus to front of Purple Line debate (Sep 3,
2003)
No one heard the buses coming. For years, the Purple
Line was a debate about trains. ..Then Del. John Adams
Hurson (D-Dist 18) of Chevy Chase mentioned Jones Bridge
Road to the right people, and a busway was quietly born.
Ehrlich
drawing the line (Aug 27, 2003)
Activists and officials accused Gov. Robert L. Ehrlich Jr.
this week of choosing the needs of wealthy golfers over
those of working-class commuters in declaring he will
never allow a transit line to cross the grounds of
Columbia Country Club.
Council
decries busway (Jul 16, 2003)
The Montgomery County Council sped up its own pace Tuesday
to urge state officials to stop studying a plan to build a
rapid busway on Jones Bridge Road and start making
progress toward building the Purple Line.
County
planners don't like proposed downcounty rapid bus line
(June 25, 2003)
County planners threw cold water last week on a Maryland
official's proposal to build a rapid bus line along Jones
Bridge Road in Chevy Chase, describing the concept as more
problematic than the Inner Purple Line endorsed by the
County Council
Purple
Line's latest mutation surprises many (Mar
26, 2003)
A month ago, the Purple Line was either a light rail line
from Bethesda to Silver Spring or a $5 billion subway
farther north.
Reaction
mixed to Purple bus route (Mar 19, 2003)
John Warnock of the anti-Purple Line Greater Bethesda
Chevy Chase
Coalition said cut-and-cover construction "would be
nearly as harmful to
the environment as an above-ground train."
Residents
react to Purple Line route (Jan 27, 2003)
Duncan brought forth a compromise Purple Line plan last
week. The plan
would connect the Silver Spring Metro station with the
Medical Center
station in Bethesda, instead of the downtown Bethesda
station as
originally conceived.