Research Desk

In this section, we provide all the background material we have collected. We assume you are looking into this and want to be briefed on all aspects of the Inner Purple Line. If you find convincing materials, articles, background information that relates to the Inner Purple Line and want us to link to it or post it please send it to us using the Contact page.

bulletMTA response to Town of Chevy Chase
bulletEconomic
bulletFact & Myth
bulletNews Articles and Clips

 

Economic Briefing

In this section, we summarize the economic arguments.  What will the project cost? estimates are based on what assumptions? What will the impact be to businesses and property values? provide all the background material we can on the project overall. 

bulletView Slide Show
bulletImpacts of Rail Transit on Property Values
bulletReview of Property Value Impacts at
Transit Stations and Lines

 

 

Fact and Myths

Myth: The Purple Line will destroy the Capital Crescent Trail.

Fact: The Capital Crescent Trail is the heavily used paved trail now running from Bethesda to Georgetown; it will not be touched by the Purple Line in any way. The Purple Line will be built on the other side of downtown Bethesda along a former railroad right-of-way bought by the county 15 years ago. When the light rail line is built, the paved trail will extend east from Wisconsin Ave. as far as Silver Spring, running alongside the new tracks. The old railroad right-of-way is 60 - 100 ft. wide in Chevy Chase, leaving room for two tracks, a trail, and a vegetated buffer. The extension of the paved trail will replace a shorter interim gravel trail, called the Georgetown Branch Trail, which goes part way to Silver Spring. Trail are used for commuters on bikes, blades and foot. The trail that is a part of the Inner Purple Line extends 4.4 miles in a direct route between Silver Spring and Bethesda.

Myth: The Outer Purple Line is better with higher ridership.

Fact: Computer calculations of ridership are higher on the Outer than Inner Purple Line. However, that ridership is inflated due to several large parking lots on the Outer line. The adjacent neighborhoods will not allow those lots to be built. Also, computer calculations omitted students commuting on the Inner line to the University of Maryland at College Park. When the corrections are made, the ridership differences will be insignificant. Given the vast cost difference, the Inner line is far more cost-effective per rider.

Myth: The Bethesda/Silver Spring portion of the Purple Line can be put underground.

Fact: If it is put underground for the better-off Chevy Chase folks, environmental justice will require that it be put underground for the whole alignment. This will raise the cost for the Inner Purple Line to nearly $3 billion dollars. (14 miles times $200 million/mile). The price tag is too high to allow it to be built. There are just too many cities around the country competing to build light rail not involving costly underground construction.

Myth: Light rail substantially slower than heavy rail.

Fact: Light rail and heavy rail use similar traction motor technology. The speed of any light rail line primarily depends on the number of stops, street crossings at grade, and the degree to which it is street-running, (i.e., mixed with automobile traffic). The Silver Spring-Bethesda section of the Inner Purple Line does not mix with automobile traffic and has only one significant street crossing. Light rail travel time between Silver Spring and Bethesda is 10 minutes; By no means is this slow.

Myth: The at-grade crossing at Connecticut Avenue will tie up traffic.

Fact: How the light rail line crosses Connecticut Avenue will be determined by the engineering work. There is no reason it can not go over (above grade) or under (below grade) Connecticut Avenue. Because the Georgetown Branch is becoming the Inner Purple Line, the odds are high that it does not cross Connecticut Avenue at-grade.

Myth: The Purple Line will not be connected to either the Bethesda or Silver Spring Metro stations.

Fact: At Bethesda, the rail line will end under Wisconsin Avenue, and a new elevator shaft will be dug to connect it with the southern end of the Bethesda Metro station. This station was built with a "knock out panel" to allow easy access. This elevator will also serve as a new southern entrance to the Bethesda Metro station for Bethesda residents and workers.

In Silver Spring, the light rail will follow the existing CSX railroad right-of-way to the new Silver Spring Transit Center, which will include the Silver Spring Metro Station. The Silver Spring light rail stop will actually be between the Metro station and the new transit center within the railroad right-of-way.

Myth: Light rail would introduce new technology to Metro and require new investment in equipment, maintenance, and staff.

Fact: There are several existing transit agencies that have both heavy and light rail as part of their system network. Philadelphia and Boston are two that come to mind. They have both heavy and light rail. Closer by is Baltimore; Baltimore's experience is typical of transit and rail system operations. The local political leadership in the Baltimore region has not made the necessary commitment to transit oriented development that Montgomery County has. Furthermore, Baltimore has never made the commitment to or put out the incentives to build ridership that have been made or done in the Washington, DC area.

Myth: Light rail will not generate the 50% fare box recovery required by state law.

Fact: Several years ago, the General Assembly changed the cost recovery requirements to 40% for transit projects and it gave new rail projects a one year exemption to allow them a period of time to build ridership. Also the cost recovery requirement applies to the entire system, not to individual lines and routes.

Why must transit projects be required to meet specific cost recovery requirements? There is no "cost recovery requirement" for roads. The gas tax and other automobile fees go to pay for State roads. While the State does give the County and municipalities a small portion of the State gas tax revenue, this portion does not come close to covering the total costs of County or municipal roads. The cost of these roads comes from the property tax and piggy-back to the State income tax collected by Counties and municipalities.

Myth: An Outer Purple Line integrated into the existing Metrorail system would be better utilized.

Fact: What Montgomery County needs is a transit ladder for east-west transportation, and the first rung should be the Purple Line between Bethesda and Silver Spring. The County owns the right-of-way, and this rung can be built and operating on it by 2008. An Outer Purple Line, if started when the next Governor takes office, could not be built and operating until some time after 2020 because it is longer to build. That wait is too long to provide a viable transportation alternative to the County’s two largest employment centers: Bethesda and Silver Spring.

Myth: Monorail could be built instead of light rail to avoid impacts on  the community.

Fact:  Monorail is much more intrusive than at-grade light rail - it looks  very much like an overhead rail line, as shown in this picture and this one from Las Vegas.  The Las Vegas monorail vehicles are also much  slower and carry fewer passengers than the light rail Purple Line would  carry.  Furthermore, monorail is a proprietary technology, with each  manufacturer making its own different type of system - meaning that when  you need spare parts, or new vehicles, or want to expand the system, you  can't get competitive bids and have to pay what the manufacturer wants.

 

Inner Purple Line in the News

(Click on the title in blue to link to the articles below.)

Duncan, O’Malley agree on Purple Line, but make no promises (June 16, 2006)
Although Baltimore Mayor Martin O’Malley and Montgomery County Executive Douglas M. Duncan said they support a long-debated Purple Line project linking Montgomery and Prince George’s counties, advocates wanted to hear a solid commitment to building the 14-mile light-rail line at the Greater Washington Board of Trade forum in Bethesda.

Bethesda Metro station entrance proposal has twice the importance (May 9, 2006)
Montgomery County Council President George Leventhal makes no secret of why he wants Maryland to spend $50 million to build a series of high-speed elevators at the south end of the Bethesda Metro station...help boost Metro ridership ...would also be a minor victory in a decades-long battle to build the $2 billion Purple Line

Another Rail Line Route Added   (May 4, 2005)
Transportation planners have added a third potential alignment for the Inner Purple Line route in east Silver Spring and Takoma Park.

Students Could Benefit from a Little Purple  (April 29, 2005)
A new Metro line to suburban Maryland could benefit the many GW students that live or work in Maryland but do not have cars. Currently, the Metro extends into all of these cities but do not connect to each other, or places in between.

Purple Line Likely to be Key Issue in Governor's Race (March 6, 2005)
In the ongoing debate over whether highways or railways will best solve Washington's crushing traffic problems, the Purple Line once seemed like the clear winner...But three years later, with a new governor in office, the proposal languishes in the planning stages.

Fortunes Shift for East-West Rail Line (Jan 16, 2005)
It was only three years ago -- the blink of an eye in transportation planning -- that a proposed light-rail link between Bethesda and New Carrollton via Silver Spring seemed on a fast track to construction....The 14-mile Purple Line is on what Montgomery County Council President Tom Perez (D-Silver Spring) calls "life support."

Silver Spring Transit LInk Up for Vote (Sept 30, 2004)
Montgomery County planning officials are expected to vote today on whether to study two routes for a light-rail line between Silver Spring and Langley Park

Sierra Club: Purple Line imperiled   (Jun 21, 2004)
The Sierra Club is criticizing the Bush administration for what it says is a lack of money that puts new rail projects, including the Purple Line from Bethesda to New Carrollton, at risk.
Response from Federal Transit Administration  (Aug 3, 2004)

Council, university back transit plans for College Park area   (Apr 14, 2004)
The College Park City Council applauded the efforts Tuesday of state transit administration officials who are working on plans for a bi-county public transportation system.

Senate expected to pass transportation bill  (Apr 9, 2004)
Montgomery lawmakers extract project promises.

No transitway for Takoma Park streets  (March 3, 2004)
State transportation planners have abandoned a proposal to build an east-west rapid transit line through the center of Takoma Park, and will focus instead on other routes to bring the Bi-County Transitway through, around or under the city, a state official said Tuesday.

Chamber of Commerce sets transportation priorities  (Dec 3, 2003)
A light rail trolley from Silver Spring to Bethesda, an east-west highway linking I-270 and I-95, and an enlarged Montrose Parkway would ease traffic congestion, improving conditions for Bethesda and Chevy Chase businesses, according to the local chamber of commerce.

 Officials blast transitway, call for Purple Line revival   (Sep 24, 2003)
State, county and local officials in eastern Montgomery County voiced their opposition last week to the Bi-County Transitway, calling instead for state transportation planners to revive the Purple Line.

Hurson rides bus to front of Purple Line debate  (Sep 3, 2003)
No one heard the buses coming.  For years, the Purple Line was a debate about trains. ..Then Del. John Adams Hurson (D-Dist 18) of Chevy Chase mentioned Jones Bridge Road to the right people, and a busway was quietly born.

Ehrlich drawing the line   (Aug 27, 2003)
Activists and officials accused Gov. Robert L. Ehrlich Jr. this week of choosing the needs of wealthy golfers over those of working-class commuters in declaring he will never allow a transit line to cross the grounds of Columbia Country Club.

Council decries busway   (Jul 16, 2003)
The Montgomery County Council sped up its own pace Tuesday to urge state officials to stop studying a plan to build a rapid busway on Jones Bridge Road and start making progress toward building the Purple Line.

County planners don't like proposed downcounty rapid bus line  (June 25, 2003)
County planners threw cold water last week on a Maryland official's proposal to build a rapid bus line along Jones Bridge Road in Chevy Chase, describing the concept as more problematic than the Inner Purple Line endorsed by the County Council

Purple Line's latest mutation surprises many   (Mar 26, 2003)
A month ago, the Purple Line was either a light rail line from Bethesda to Silver Spring or a $5 billion subway farther north.

Reaction mixed to Purple bus route   (Mar 19, 2003)
John Warnock of the anti-Purple Line Greater Bethesda Chevy Chase 
Coalition said cut-and-cover construction "would be nearly as harmful to 
the environment as an above-ground train."

Residents react to Purple Line route  (Jan 27, 2003)
Duncan brought forth a compromise Purple Line plan last week. The plan 
would connect the Silver Spring Metro station with the Medical Center 
station in Bethesda, instead of the downtown Bethesda station as 
originally conceived.