With polls showing overwhelming voter support for the
Inner Purple Line, opponents of the project have adopted the deceptive
tactic of disguising themselves as supporters of hiker-biker trails and
misleading the public about what the Purple Line will do to trails.
Organized hikers and bikers support light rail. Endorsements of
the Purple Line have come from the Washington Area
Bicycle Association, the area's largest cycle advocacy group, as
well as the Maryland
Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee and Bethesda-based Perils
for Pedestrians. What "Save the Trail" wants to save
is a private preserve for local residents that excludes outside trail
users as well as transit riders. At a January 2009 Planning Board
hearing, its president Mier Wolf denounced
the Purple Line because, among other things, it would "create a
bicycle raceway."
Against the Trail They Want to Save
When light rail from Bethesda to Silver Spring was first proposed in
the 1980s, the opponents made no secret that stopping the transit line
was their real objective. Columbia Country Club initially proposed
turning the railroad right of way adjoining their golf course into a
nature preserve [Wash. Post, 6/13/87]. When that proposal failed,
it filed
a lawsuit to take ownership of a portion of the right of way and
prevent construction of any trail past their property.
The Greater Bethesda Chevy Chase Coalition (GBCCC), the umbrella
group of Purple Line opponents, filed a petition with the Interstate
Commerce Commission to forbid the county to use the railroad right of
way for any purpose except freight railroading [Wash. Post,
10/18/89]. Had this petition succeeded, we would have no trail at
all -- not in Chevy Chase, and not between Bethesda and Georgetown.
But when trail and transit supporters prevailed in the courts and
regulatory agencies, the light rail opponents changed their tune.
The same GBCCC that had tried to stop the trail from being built
invented the slogan "save the trail". And in 1999, when
they set
up a new committee to pay for Annapolis lobbyists, they had the
nerve to call it the Committee to Save the Trail, or COST. Reports
filed with the State Ethics Commission reveal that COST's largest source
of funding is Columbia Country Club.
The names and slogans were adjusted, but the objective of stopping
needed mass transit did not change. The State Ethics Commission
requires lobbyists to list clients and state what they are lobbying
on. COST employed Rifkin, Livingston, Levitan, and Silver, the
lobbying firm that previously represented Columbia Country Club.
And the purpose of the lobbying was almost the same as it was when the
Country Club was against the trail: "Preserve and protect the
client's interests with respect to matters affecting the Georgetown
Branch Light Rail line and other transportation projects."
Nothing about trails, bicycles, or trees.
"Rethinking the Purple Line"
In early 2008, Purple Line opponents regrouped under the
leadership of the Town of Chevy Chase in a new coalition called
"Rethinking the Purple Line." This coalition
proclaimed that its objective was to "preserve the Capital Crescent
Trail as a natural and safe green space," but its actions showed
the real objective is still to keep mass transit away from the homes and
golf course of its backers.